Strengthening student support and usability by reorganizing content, minimizing friction in key user flows, and applying data-driven UX research.

Strengthening student support and usability by reorganizing content, minimizing friction in key user flows, and applying data-driven UX research.

Strengthening student support and usability by reorganizing content, minimizing friction in key user flows, and applying data-driven UX research.

User Research & Information Architecture Case Study
SEMTE Graduate Resources Website, Arizona State University

User Research & Information Architecture Case Study
SEMTE Graduate Resources Website, Arizona State University

User Research & Information Architecture Case Study
SEMTE Graduate Resources Website, Arizona State University

In a rush? Use the navigation below 👇 and skip to what matters most. Or scroll the journey, if you have a minute. 😊

In a rush? Use the navigation below 👇 and skip to what matters most. Or scroll the journey, if you have a minute. 😊

Client: School for Engineering of Matter, Transport and Energy, Arizona State University

Role: Communications Assistant, Ira A Fulton Schools of Engineering, ASU

Timeline: 16 weeks

Methods: User Research, User Interviews, Content Audit, Information Architecture, Usability Testing

Tools: Google Forms, Figma, WAVE Web Accessibility Evaluation Tool
Client: School for Engineering of Matter, Transport and Energy, Arizona State University
Role: Communications Assistant, Ira A Fulton Schools of Engineering, ASU
Tools: Google Forms, Figma, WAVE Web Accessibility Evaluation Tool
Timeline: 4 months

Project Overview

The SEMTE Graduate Resources website serves as a central hub for graduate students and advisors across multiple engineering programs, providing essential information on academic policies, advising processes, and student opportunities.


As the platform expanded over time, its structure became increasingly complex. Content grew, navigation pathways multiplied, and information hierarchy blurred, making it harder for users to efficiently locate critical resources.


This project focused on rethinking the website’s underlying structure through a research-driven redesign. By clarifying information architecture and simplifying navigation systems, the goal was to create a more intuitive and scalable digital experience.

Project Overview

The SEMTE Graduate Resources website serves as a central hub for graduate students and advisors across multiple engineering programs, providing essential information on academic policies, advising processes, and student opportunities.


As the platform expanded over time, its structure became increasingly complex. Content grew, navigation pathways multiplied, and information hierarchy blurred, making it harder for users to efficiently locate critical resources.


This project focused on rethinking the website’s underlying structure through a research-driven redesign. By clarifying information architecture and simplifying navigation systems, the goal was to create a more intuitive and scalable digital experience.

Project Overview

The SEMTE Graduate Resources website serves as a central hub for graduate students and advisors across multiple engineering programs, providing essential information on academic policies, advising processes, and student opportunities.


As the platform expanded over time, its structure became increasingly complex. Content grew, navigation pathways multiplied, and information hierarchy blurred, making it harder for users to efficiently locate critical resources.


This project focused on rethinking the website’s underlying structure through a research-driven redesign. By clarifying information architecture and simplifying navigation systems, the goal was to create a more intuitive and scalable digital experience.

🙁 Before


  • Fragmented content structure

  • Redundant and unclear navigation labels

  • Inconsistent grouping of academic information

  • Users relying on external links or advisors for clarity

🙁 Before


  • Fragmented content structure

  • Redundant and unclear navigation labels

  • Inconsistent grouping of academic information

  • Users relying on external links or advisors for clarity

🙁 Before


  • Fragmented content structure

  • Redundant and unclear navigation labels

  • Inconsistent grouping of academic information

  • Users relying on external links or advisors for clarity

😀 After


  • Structured, program-based content hierarchy

  • Simplified information grouping and consistent navigation model

  • Improved accessibility and readability

  • Scalable framework for long-term updates

😀 After


  • Structured, program-based content hierarchy

  • Simplified information grouping and consistent navigation model

  • Improved accessibility and readability

  • Scalable framework for long-term updates

😀 After


  • Structured, program-based content hierarchy

  • Simplified information grouping and consistent navigation model

  • Improved accessibility and readability

  • Scalable framework for long-term updates

My Role


As a Communications Assistant at the Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering, I independently led the UX research and redesign of the SEMTE Graduate Resources website.

With guidance from my manager and professor, I managed the end-to-end process, including:

  • Heuristic evaluations

  • User research and insight synthesis

  • Information architecture restructuring

  • Navigation system redesign

  • High-fidelity prototyping


This project demonstrates my ability to:

  • Lead research independently

  • Translate complexity into structured systems

  • Design scalable solutions within institutional constraints

  • Apply product design thinking to academic platforms

My Role


As a Communications Assistant at the Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering, I independently led the UX research and redesign of the SEMTE Graduate Resources website.

With guidance from my manager and professor, I managed the end-to-end process, including:

  • Heuristic evaluations

  • User research and insight synthesis

  • Information architecture restructuring

  • Navigation system redesign

  • High-fidelity prototyping


This project demonstrates my ability to:

  • Lead research independently

  • Translate complexity into structured systems

  • Design scalable solutions within institutional constraints

  • Apply product design thinking to academic platforms

My Role


As a Communications Assistant at the Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering, I independently led the UX research and redesign of the SEMTE Graduate Resources website.

With guidance from my manager and professor, I managed the end-to-end process, including:

  • Heuristic evaluations

  • User research and insight synthesis

  • Information architecture restructuring

  • Navigation system redesign

  • High-fidelity prototyping


This project demonstrates my ability to:

  • Lead research independently

  • Translate complexity into structured systems

  • Design scalable solutions within institutional constraints

  • Apply product design thinking to academic platforms

Context

Context

Problem Statement

The SEMTE Graduate Resources website lacked a cohesive information architecture and intuitive navigation system. Critical academic resources were buried within inconsistent layouts, redundant links, and fragmented categories, making discovery difficult for both students and advisors.

Problem Statement

The SEMTE Graduate Resources website lacked a cohesive information architecture and intuitive navigation system. Critical academic resources were buried within inconsistent layouts, redundant links, and fragmented categories, making discovery difficult for both students and advisors.

Problem Statement

The SEMTE Graduate Resources website lacked a cohesive information architecture and intuitive navigation system. Critical academic resources were buried within inconsistent layouts, redundant links, and fragmented categories, making discovery difficult for both students and advisors.

Business Challenges


  • Increased dependency on staff support, reducing administrative efficiency

  • Inconsistent content updates due to lack of a scalable design system

  • Absence of unified design standards, weakening brand credibility within the Fulton Schools ecosystem

Business Challenges


  • Increased dependency on staff support, reducing administrative efficiency

  • Inconsistent content updates due to lack of a scalable design system

  • Absence of unified design standards, weakening brand credibility within the Fulton Schools ecosystem

Business Challenges


  • Increased dependency on staff support, reducing administrative efficiency

  • Inconsistent content updates due to lack of a scalable design system

  • Absence of unified design standards, weakening brand credibility within the Fulton Schools ecosystem

User Friction


Navigation Challenges

  • Difficulty locating advising forms, program requirements, and funding resources

  • Unclear labeling and redundant pathways


Cognitive Overload

  • Long, text-heavy pages

  • No clear visual hierarchy for scanning


Fragmented Experience

  • Graduate life information scattered across multiple pages

  • Limited cross-linking between related content


Accessibility Gaps

  • Not optimized for mobile users

  • Limited support for screen readers

User Friction


Navigation Challenges

  • Difficulty locating advising forms, program requirements, and funding resources

  • Unclear labeling and redundant pathways


Cognitive Overload

  • Long, text-heavy pages

  • No clear visual hierarchy for scanning


Fragmented Experience

  • Graduate life information scattered across multiple pages

  • Limited cross-linking between related content


Accessibility Gaps

  • Not optimized for mobile users

  • Limited support for screen readers

User Friction


Navigation Challenges

  • Difficulty locating advising forms, program requirements, and funding resources

  • Unclear labeling and redundant pathways


Cognitive Overload

  • Long, text-heavy pages

  • No clear visual hierarchy for scanning


Fragmented Experience

  • Graduate life information scattered across multiple pages

  • Limited cross-linking between related content


Accessibility Gaps

  • Not optimized for mobile users

  • Limited support for screen readers

Design Goals

The redesign aimed to:

  • Create a centralized, easy-to-navigate hub for graduate students.

  • Simplify content structure and enhance information discoverability.

  • Establish a consistent visual language aligned with ASU brand standards.

  • Improve accessibility and readability across devices.

  • Reduce student dependence on administrative staff for basic information.

Design Goals

The redesign aimed to:

  • Create a centralized, easy-to-navigate hub for graduate students.

  • Simplify content structure and enhance information discoverability.

  • Establish a consistent visual language aligned with ASU brand standards.

  • Improve accessibility and readability across devices.

  • Reduce student dependence on administrative staff for basic information.

Design Goals

The redesign aimed to:

  • Create a centralized, easy-to-navigate hub for graduate students.

  • Simplify content structure and enhance information discoverability.

  • Establish a consistent visual language aligned with ASU brand standards.

  • Improve accessibility and readability across devices.

  • Reduce student dependence on administrative staff for basic information.

Initial Website

Initial Website

User Research

User Research

Research Strategy

To design a user-centered solution, I conducted structured research to understand:

  • How graduate students navigated the existing site

  • Where friction occurred

  • What prevented efficient task completion

  • How the platform could better support academic decision-making

The research included:

Heuristic Evaluation • Google Survey • User Interviews • Accessibility Audit

Each method uncovered different layers of usability and structural issues.

Research Strategy

To design a user-centered solution, I conducted structured research to understand:

  • How graduate students navigated the existing site

  • Where friction occurred

  • What prevented efficient task completion

  • How the platform could better support academic decision-making

The research included:

Heuristic Evaluation • Google Survey • User Interviews • Accessibility Audit

Each method uncovered different layers of usability and structural issues.

Heuristic Evaluation
(Nielsen’s 10 Usability Heuristics)

Inconsistent Navigation

  • Violated recognition and consistency standards

  • Navigation patterns changed across pages

Cognitive Overload

  • Dense content blocks with minimal visual hierarchy

Poor System Feedback

  • No confirmation messaging for actions like form submissions

Lack of Error Prevention

  • Limited guidance or recovery pathways

Heuristic Evaluation
(Nielsen’s 10 Usability Heuristics)

Inconsistent Navigation

  • Violated recognition and consistency standards

  • Navigation patterns changed across pages

Cognitive Overload

  • Dense content blocks with minimal visual hierarchy

Poor System Feedback

  • No confirmation messaging for actions like form submissions

Lack of Error Prevention

  • Limited guidance or recovery pathways

Heuristic Evaluation
(Nielsen’s 10 Usability Heuristics)

Inconsistent Navigation

  • Violated recognition and consistency standards

  • Navigation patterns changed across pages

Cognitive Overload

  • Dense content blocks with minimal visual hierarchy

Poor System Feedback

  • No confirmation messaging for actions like form submissions

Lack of Error Prevention

  • Limited guidance or recovery pathways

Accessibility Audit
(WCAG 2.1 Audit using WAVE)


Missing Alt Text

  • Linked images lacked descriptive alternatives

Low Color Contrast

  • Reduced readability, especially for visually impaired users

Improper Heading Structure

  • Screen readers struggled to interpret content hierarchy

Redundant Links & Titles

  • Increased cognitive friction and confusion

Accessibility Audit
(WCAG 2.1 Audit using WAVE)


Missing Alt Text

  • Linked images lacked descriptive alternatives

Low Color Contrast

  • Reduced readability, especially for visually impaired users

Improper Heading Structure

  • Screen readers struggled to interpret content hierarchy

Redundant Links & Titles

  • Increased cognitive friction and confusion

Accessibility Audit
(WCAG 2.1 Audit using WAVE)


Missing Alt Text

  • Linked images lacked descriptive alternatives

Low Color Contrast

  • Reduced readability, especially for visually impaired users

Improper Heading Structure

  • Screen readers struggled to interpret content hierarchy

Redundant Links & Titles

  • Increased cognitive friction and confusion

How This Informed Design


The findings directly influenced:

  • Improved color contrast ratios

  • Clear heading hierarchies

  • Descriptive alt text implementation

  • Simplified and consistent navigation systems

This ensured the redesign prioritized equity, clarity, and usability at scale.

How This Informed Design


The findings directly influenced:

  • Improved color contrast ratios

  • Clear heading hierarchies

  • Descriptive alt text implementation

  • Simplified and consistent navigation systems

This ensured the redesign prioritized equity, clarity, and usability at scale.

Heuristic Evaluation

Heuristic Evaluation

Accessibility Evaluation

Accessibility Evaluation

User Research

User Research

Research Synthesis

To develop a well-rounded understanding of user behavior, I used a combination of quantitative and qualitative research methods. While the survey provided measurable patterns at scale, user interviews offered deeper insight into motivations, frustrations, and mental models. Together, these methods ensured that design decisions were grounded in both data and lived user experience.

Research Synthesis


To develop a well-rounded understanding of user behavior, I used a combination of quantitative and qualitative research methods. While the survey provided measurable patterns at scale, user interviews offered deeper insight into motivations, frustrations, and mental models. Together, these methods ensured that design decisions were grounded in both data and lived user experience.

Research Synthesis

To develop a well-rounded understanding of user behavior, I used a combination of quantitative and qualitative research methods. While the survey provided measurable patterns at scale, user interviews offered deeper insight into motivations, frustrations, and mental models. Together, these methods ensured that design decisions were grounded in both data and lived user experience.

Quantitative Method

Google Survey

To understand usage patterns at scale, I distributed a survey across graduate students from multiple SEMTE programs.

The goal was to uncover:

  • Frequency of website usage

  • Most sought-after resources

  • Key navigation pain points

Quantitative Method

Google Survey

To understand usage patterns at scale, I distributed a survey across graduate students from multiple SEMTE programs.

The goal was to uncover:

  • Frequency of website usage

  • Most sought-after resources

  • Key navigation pain points

Quantitative Method

Google Survey

To understand usage patterns at scale, I distributed a survey across graduate students from multiple SEMTE programs.

The goal was to uncover:

  • Frequency of website usage

  • Most sought-after resources

  • Key navigation pain points

Qualitative Method

User Interview

To deepen the findings, I conducted in-depth interviews with graduate students across different programs.

Each session explored:

  • Information-seeking behaviors

  • Navigation expectations

  • Mental models of how academic resources should be structured

Qualitative Method

User Interview

To deepen the findings, I conducted in-depth interviews with graduate students across different programs.

Each session explored:

  • Information-seeking behaviors

  • Navigation expectations

  • Mental models of how academic resources should be structured

Qualitative Method

User Interview

To deepen the findings, I conducted in-depth interviews with graduate students across different programs.

Each session explored:

  • Information-seeking behaviors

  • Navigation expectations

  • Mental models of how academic resources should be structured

Quantitative Insights

85% of respondents found it “somewhat difficult” or “very difficult” to locate key academic resources.

Most Accessed Sections

  • Advising

  • Degree Requirements

  • Funding Opportunities

Content Preference

  • Students favored concise, well-structured content

  • Clear visual hierarchy over long text-heavy pages

Quantitative Insights

85% of respondents found it “somewhat difficult” or “very difficult” to locate key academic resources.

Most Accessed Sections

  • Advising

  • Degree Requirements

  • Funding Opportunities

Content Preference

  • Students favored concise, well-structured content

  • Clear visual hierarchy over long text-heavy pages

Quantitative Insights

85% of respondents found it “somewhat difficult” or “very difficult” to locate key academic resources.

Most Accessed Sections

  • Advising

  • Degree Requirements

  • Funding Opportunities

Content Preference

  • Students favored concise, well-structured content

  • Clear visual hierarchy over long text-heavy pages

Qualitative Insights

Low Structural Trust

  • Students relied on Google search instead of navigating the site directly

Hidden Resources

  • Many were unaware of available student organizations and research support

Desire for Centralization

  • Participants wanted a dashboard-like experience with aggregated key links

Qualitative Insights

Low Structural Trust

  • Students relied on Google search instead of navigating the site directly

Hidden Resources

  • Many were unaware of available student organizations and research support

Desire for Centralization

  • Participants wanted a dashboard-like experience with aggregated key links

Qualitative Insights

Low Structural Trust

  • Students relied on Google search instead of navigating the site directly

Hidden Resources

  • Many were unaware of available student organizations and research support

Desire for Centralization

  • Participants wanted a dashboard-like experience with aggregated key links

Design Implications

These insights directly informed:

  • Persona development

  • Journey mapping

  • Centralized navigation restructuring

  • Exploration of dashboard-style information grouping

Design Implications


These insights directly informed:

  • Persona development

  • Journey mapping

  • Centralized navigation restructuring

  • Exploration of dashboard-style information grouping

Design Implications

These insights directly informed:

  • Persona development

  • Journey mapping

  • Centralized navigation restructuring

  • Exploration of dashboard-style information grouping

Quantitative Analysis

Quantitative Analysis

User Research

User Research

Persona Creation


Based on the insights gathered from the survey and user interviews, I developed three key personas representing the primary user groups of the SEMTE Graduate Resources website- current graduate students in first year, Current graduate students who are about to graduate and SEMTE Graduate Advisors.


These personas helped humanize the research findings and guided all major design decisions, from information architecture to content hierarchy.

Persona Creation


Based on the insights gathered from the survey and user interviews, I developed three key personas representing the primary user groups of the SEMTE Graduate Resources website- current graduate students in first year, Current graduate students who are about to graduate and SEMTE Graduate Advisors.


These personas helped humanize the research findings and guided all major design decisions, from information architecture to content hierarchy.

User Personas

User Personas

User

Research

User Research

User Research

User Testing (Pre-Design)


Before diving into redesign, I conducted moderated usability testing on the existing SEMTE Graduate Resources website to surface real user pain points. Five participants performed scenario-based tasks while thinking aloud, allowing me to capture friction and mental models in context.


5 Participants • 3 Core Scenarios • Moderated Think-Aloud Testing


Testing Approach

Participants completed three real-world scenarios reflecting core student needs:

User Testing (Pre-Design)


Before diving into redesign, I conducted moderated usability testing on the existing SEMTE Graduate Resources website to surface real user pain points. Five participants performed scenario-based tasks while thinking aloud, allowing me to capture friction and mental models in context.


5 Participants • 3 Core Scenarios • Moderated Think-Aloud Testing


Testing Approach

Participants completed three real-world scenarios reflecting core student needs:

User Testing (Pre-Design)


Before diving into redesign, I conducted moderated usability testing on the existing SEMTE Graduate Resources website to surface real user pain points. Five participants performed scenario-based tasks while thinking aloud, allowing me to capture friction and mental models in context.


5 Participants • 3 Core Scenarios • Moderated Think-Aloud Testing


Testing Approach

Participants completed three real-world scenarios reflecting core student needs:

Scenario 1

🎓 Graduation Planning


  • Locate faculty advisor selection process

  • Find program checksheets

Scenario 1

🎓 Graduation Planning


  • Locate faculty advisor selection process

  • Find program checksheets

Scenario 1

🎓 Graduation Planning


  • Locate faculty advisor selection process

  • Find program checksheets

Scenario 2

🌍 OPT & CPT Information


  • Identify eligibility requirements

  • Locate SEMTE policies for work authorization

Scenario 2

🌍 OPT & CPT Information


  • Identify eligibility requirements

  • Locate SEMTE policies for work authorization

Scenario 2

🌍 OPT & CPT Information


  • Identify eligibility requirements

  • Locate SEMTE policies for work authorization

Scenario 3

📚 Student Resources & Opportunities


  • Explore technical electives

  • Find scholarships and fellowship timelines

Scenario 3

📚 Student Resources & Opportunities


  • Explore technical electives

  • Find scholarships and fellowship timelines

Scenario 3

📚 Student Resources & Opportunities


  • Explore technical electives

  • Find scholarships and fellowship timelines

Key Findings


Navigation Complexity

  • Essential information required multiple clicks

  • Unclear labeling slowed task completion


Fragmented Content

  • Related information was scattered across pages

  • International students experienced heightened confusion


Low Scannability

  • Inconsistent link styles

  • Dense text blocks without visual hierarchy

Key Findings


Navigation Complexity

  • Essential information required multiple clicks

  • Unclear labeling slowed task completion


Fragmented Content

  • Related information was scattered across pages

  • International students experienced heightened confusion


Low Scannability

  • Inconsistent link styles

  • Dense text blocks without visual hierarchy

Key Findings


Navigation Complexity

  • Essential information required multiple clicks

  • Unclear labeling slowed task completion


Fragmented Content

  • Related information was scattered across pages

  • International students experienced heightened confusion


Low Scannability

  • Inconsistent link styles

  • Dense text blocks without visual hierarchy

Design Impact


These usability insights directly shaped:

  • Information architecture restructuring

  • Task-based navigation grouping

  • Improved content hierarchy and scannability

The redesign shifted from a page-based structure to a task-focused, user-centered experience.

Design Impact


These usability insights directly shaped:

  • Information architecture restructuring

  • Task-based navigation grouping

  • Improved content hierarchy and scannability

The redesign shifted from a page-based structure to a task-focused, user-centered experience.

Design Impact


These usability insights directly shaped:

  • Information architecture restructuring

  • Task-based navigation grouping

  • Improved content hierarchy and scannability

The redesign shifted from a page-based structure to a task-focused, user-centered experience.

Design

Process

Design Process

Design Process

Wireframes


To translate the research insights into a clear and structured design direction, I began by developing low- and mid-fidelity wireframes using the ASU Unity Design System — a university-wide framework built to ensure visual consistency, accessibility compliance, and cohesive user experience across all ASU digital platforms.

The focus during this phase was on:

  • Information hierarchy: Organizing key content areas—advising, funding, graduation, and CPT/OPT—based on frequency of use and user goals identified during research.

  • Navigation clarity: Simplifying menu structures and adding quick-access links to reduce cognitive load and help users find information efficiently.

  • Layout consistency: Adopting pre-defined Unity components for typography, spacing, and button styles to align with ASU’s brand and accessibility standards.

  • Scalability: Structuring layouts that could be easily expanded or modified as new resources are added by the SEMTE team.

These wireframes acted as the foundation for iterative feedback sessions with my manager and peers, ensuring that each design decision supported both user needs and organizational objectives.

Wireframes


To translate the research insights into a clear and structured design direction, I began by developing low- and mid-fidelity wireframes using the ASU Unity Design System — a university-wide framework built to ensure visual consistency, accessibility compliance, and cohesive user experience across all ASU digital platforms.

The focus during this phase was on:

  • Information hierarchy: Organizing key content areas—advising, funding, graduation, and CPT/OPT—based on frequency of use and user goals identified during research.

  • Navigation clarity: Simplifying menu structures and adding quick-access links to reduce cognitive load and help users find information efficiently.

  • Layout consistency: Adopting pre-defined Unity components for typography, spacing, and button styles to align with ASU’s brand and accessibility standards.

  • Scalability: Structuring layouts that could be easily expanded or modified as new resources are added by the SEMTE team.

These wireframes acted as the foundation for iterative feedback sessions with my manager and peers, ensuring that each design decision supported both user needs and organizational objectives.

Final Design

Final Design

Building on the insights from research, testing, and wireframes, I transitioned into creating high-fidelity designs using the ASU Unity Design System.


My goal was to blend clarity, consistency, and accessibility while ensuring the experience felt intuitive for graduate students with diverse needs.


I refined the visual hierarchy, strengthened navigation pathways, and applied a modular layout structure that keeps information scannable and easy to update.


Each page was designed with purpose, reducing cognitive load, highlighting time-sensitive tasks, and surfacing key academic resources exactly when students need them.


This phase transformed validated wireframes into polished, functional screens that reflect SEMTE’s academic identity while supporting real student workflows.

Building on the insights from research, testing, and wireframes, I transitioned into creating high-fidelity designs using the ASU Unity Design System.


My goal was to blend clarity, consistency, and accessibility while ensuring the experience felt intuitive for graduate students with diverse needs.


I refined the visual hierarchy, strengthened navigation pathways, and applied a modular layout structure that keeps information scannable and easy to update.


Each page was designed with purpose, reducing cognitive load, highlighting time-sensitive tasks, and surfacing key academic resources exactly when students need them.


This phase transformed validated wireframes into polished, functional screens that reflect SEMTE’s academic identity while supporting real student workflows.

Final Design

Final Design

Final Design

Homepage Design

Homepage Design

Homepage Design

The redesigned homepage serves as the central entry point for all SEMTE graduate resources, structured to support fast discovery, clarity, and confidence for new and current students.


Key Highlights of the Homepage Design:


Clear Information Architecture: The homepage organizes content into four primary pathways—Advising, Graduation, Funding, and International Student Support—reflecting the top needs identified during research and usability testing.


Task-Oriented Navigation: Prominent quick links help users immediately access high-demand resources such as forms, checklists, and policy documents without deep navigation.


Structured Program Breakdown: Programs are displayed in an organized grid, allowing users to quickly locate program-specific requirements, faculty advisors, and technical elective lists.


Student-Centered Copy: Content is rewritten to be direct and actionable, reducing ambiguity and helping students understand what to do next.


Overall, the homepage establishes a strong foundation for the site—visually cohesive, logically structured, and designed to guide students to the right information with fewer clicks.

The redesigned homepage serves as the central entry point for all SEMTE graduate resources, structured to support fast discovery, clarity, and confidence for new and current students.


Key Highlights of the Homepage Design:


  • Clear Information Architecture: The homepage organizes content into four primary pathways, Advising, Graduation, Funding, and International Student Support, reflecting the top needs identified during research and usability testing.


  • Task-Oriented Navigation: Prominent quick links help users immediately access high-demand resources such as forms, checklists, and policy documents without deep navigation.


  • Structured Program Breakdown: Programs are displayed in an organized grid, allowing users to quickly locate program-specific requirements, faculty advisors, and technical elective lists.


  • Student-Centered Copy: Content is rewritten to be direct and actionable, reducing ambiguity and helping students understand what to do next.


Overall, the homepage establishes a strong foundation for the site, visually cohesive, logically structured, and designed to guide students to the right information with fewer clicks.

The redesigned homepage serves as the central entry point for all SEMTE graduate resources, structured to support fast discovery, clarity, and confidence for new and current students.


Key Highlights of the Homepage Design:


  • Clear Information Architecture: The homepage organizes content into four primary pathways, Advising, Graduation, Funding, and International Student Support, reflecting the top needs identified during research and usability testing.


  • Task-Oriented Navigation: Prominent quick links help users immediately access high-demand resources such as forms, checklists, and policy documents without deep navigation.


  • Structured Program Breakdown: Programs are displayed in an organized grid, allowing users to quickly locate program-specific requirements, faculty advisors, and technical elective lists.


  • Student-Centered Copy: Content is rewritten to be direct and actionable, reducing ambiguity and helping students understand what to do next.


Overall, the homepage establishes a strong foundation for the site, visually cohesive, logically structured, and designed to guide students to the right information with fewer clicks.

Programs Page Design

Programs Page Design

Programs Page Design

The Programs page provides a structured overview of all SEMTE graduate offerings, allowing students to quickly locate their program and access essential resources. Using a clean grid layout, each program card highlights key information at a glance—degree type, specialization, and direct access to program-specific guides. This page reduces search time and supports students who prefer scanning before committing to deeper navigation.


Each individual program page provides a clear, structured view of all essential academic information, tailored to help students quickly find exactly what they need. Every page includes a brief introduction outlining the program’s purpose, structure, and key expectations, advising information, course requirements, program chair details and

important deadlines (alert boxes).


Consistent layouts across programs help students navigate with confidence, reducing cognitive load and making academic planning simpler and more intuitive.

The Programs page provides a structured overview of all SEMTE graduate offerings, allowing students to quickly locate their program and access essential resources. Using a clean grid layout, each program card highlights key information at a glance—degree type, specialization, and direct access to program-specific guides. This page reduces search time and supports students who prefer scanning before committing to deeper navigation.


Each individual program page provides a clear, structured view of all essential academic information, tailored to help students quickly find exactly what they need. Every page includes a brief introduction outlining the program’s purpose, structure, and key expectations, advising information, course requirements, program chair details and

important deadlines (alert boxes).


Consistent layouts across programs help students navigate with confidence, reducing cognitive load and making academic planning simpler and more intuitive.

The Programs page provides a structured overview of all SEMTE graduate offerings, allowing students to quickly locate their program and access essential resources. Using a clean grid layout, each program card highlights key information at a glance—degree type, specialization, and direct access to program-specific guides. This page reduces search time and supports students who prefer scanning before committing to deeper navigation.


Each individual program page provides a clear, structured view of all essential academic information, tailored to help students quickly find exactly what they need. Every page includes a brief introduction outlining the program’s purpose, structure, and key expectations, advising information, course requirements, program chair details and

important deadlines (alert boxes).


Consistent layouts across programs help students navigate with confidence, reducing cognitive load and making academic planning simpler and more intuitive.

Culminating Events Page Design

Culminating Events Page Design

Culminating Events Page Design

The Portfolio, Thesis, and Applied Project pages break down each culminating option into simple, easy-to-follow steps. Each page includes:


Clear Process Overview: A quick explanation of what the culminating experience involves and who it’s for.

Step-by-Step Requirements: Structured guidance on proposal guidelines, submission steps, and evaluation expectations.

Faculty & Advising Support: Direct links to advisors, committee requirements, and approval workflows.

Important Deadlines: Alert boxes highlight key dates so students can stay on track throughout the process.


These pages remove confusion around graduation pathways and help students confidently choose and complete the option that best aligns with their academic goals.

The Portfolio, Thesis, and Applied Project pages break down each culminating option into simple, easy-to-follow steps. Each page includes:


Clear Process Overview: A quick explanation of what the culminating experience involves and who it’s for.

Step-by-Step Requirements: Structured guidance on proposal guidelines, submission steps, and evaluation expectations.

Faculty & Advising Support: Direct links to advisors, committee requirements, and approval workflows.

Important Deadlines: Alert boxes highlight key dates so students can stay on track throughout the process.


These pages remove confusion around graduation pathways and help students confidently choose and complete the option that best aligns with their academic goals.

Other Pages Design

Other Pages Design

Other Pages Design

Student Resources Page


This page consolidates all essential academic and support resources into one intuitive space. Students can easily access tutoring, writing support, lab information, policies, and links to university-wide services. Organized sections and clear labeling help users quickly find the tools they need to succeed throughout their program.


CPT & OPT Information Page


The CPT/OPT page simplifies complex immigration and employment information for international students. It provides clear explanations of eligibility, required steps, SEMTE-specific guidelines, and links to official ISSC resources. The structured layout reduces cognitive load and ensures students feel confident navigating work authorization processes.

Student Resources Page


This page consolidates all essential academic and support resources into one intuitive space. Students can easily access tutoring, writing support, lab information, policies, and links to university-wide services. Organized sections and clear labeling help users quickly find the tools they need to succeed throughout their program.


CPT & OPT Information Page


The CPT/OPT page simplifies complex immigration and employment information for international students. It provides clear explanations of eligibility, required steps, SEMTE-specific guidelines, and links to official ISSC resources. The structured layout reduces cognitive load and ensures students feel confident navigating work authorization processes.

Quick Links Page


Designed for fast access, the Quick Links page gathers the most frequently used SEMTE resources, forms, program documents, electives lists, policies, and student services, into a clean, scannable format. It eliminates unnecessary searching and supports students who regularly return for specific information.


Advisors Page


This page helps students identify the right academic advisor or program chair with ease. It includes advisor names, roles, contact details, and relevant responsibilities. A structured layout ensures students can quickly locate guidance based on their program and connect with the right support at the right time.

Quick Links Page


Designed for fast access, the Quick Links page gathers the most frequently used SEMTE resources, forms, program documents, electives lists, policies, and student services, into a clean, scannable format. It eliminates unnecessary searching and supports students who regularly return for specific information.


Advisors Page


This page helps students identify the right academic advisor or program chair with ease. It includes advisor names, roles, contact details, and relevant responsibilities. A structured layout ensures students can quickly locate guidance based on their program and connect with the right support at the right time.

Impact

Impact

The redesigned SEMTE Graduate Resources platform has the potential to significantly improve how students navigate critical academic information. By restructuring content, clarifying pathways, and strengthening visual hierarchy, the new design reduces the time and cognitive effort required to find program details, policies, and graduation requirements.


  • Improved findability of key information such as program requirements, CPT/OPT policies, and graduation steps.


  • Reduced cognitive load through clearer content structure, consistent layouts, and simplified navigation.


  • Created a more accessible and supportive experience for international students.


  • Strengthened visual hierarchy and alignment with ASU’s Unity Design System for a cohesive experience.


  • Enabled smoother academic planning by organizing content in a predictable, student-friendly format.

The redesigned SEMTE Graduate Resources platform has the potential to significantly improve how students navigate critical academic information. By restructuring content, clarifying pathways, and strengthening visual hierarchy, the new design reduces the time and cognitive effort required to find program details, policies, and graduation requirements.


  • Improved findability of key information such as program requirements, CPT/OPT policies, and graduation steps.


  • Reduced cognitive load through clearer content structure, consistent layouts, and simplified navigation.


  • Created a more accessible and supportive experience for international students.


  • Strengthened visual hierarchy and alignment with ASU’s Unity Design System for a cohesive experience.


  • Enabled smoother academic planning by organizing content in a predictable, student-friendly format.

Key Learnings

Key Learnings

Working on this project taught me how deeply clarity, or the lack of it, impacts a student’s ability to make important academic decisions. Through user interviews and testing, I began to see patterns in how overwhelmed students often feel when navigating policies, deadlines, and forms scattered across pages.


Personally, I learned how to balance university branding constraints with user-centered design decisions, and how to translate complex academic structures into simple pathways. I also refined my ability to synthesize large amounts of information and create systems that feel structured, predictable, and reassuring.


Because this was a solo project, I strengthened my end-to-end UX process, from research to testing to high-fidelity design, while regularly seeking feedback from my manager and professor. This helped me grow not only as a designer but also as a decision-maker.

Working on this project taught me how deeply clarity, or the lack of it, impacts a student’s ability to make important academic decisions. Through user interviews and testing, I began to see patterns in how overwhelmed students often feel when navigating policies, deadlines, and forms scattered across pages.


Personally, I learned how to balance university branding constraints with user-centered design decisions, and how to translate complex academic structures into simple pathways. I also refined my ability to synthesize large amounts of information and create systems that feel structured, predictable, and reassuring.


Because this was a solo project, I strengthened my end-to-end UX process, from research to testing to high-fidelity design, while regularly seeking feedback from my manager and professor. This helped me grow not only as a designer but also as a decision-maker.

Going

Forward

Going Forward

Moving forward, the next steps would focus on refining and validating the design through:


  • Usability testing on the high-fidelity prototype to confirm improvements in navigation, clarity, and findability.


  • Content collaboration with SEMTE staff, ensuring program pages remain accurate, consistent, and easy to maintain.


  • Enhancing personalization, such as adding role-based quick access sections (e.g., international students, graduating students, new admits).


  • Iterating on accessibility, including improved alt text coverage, heading structure, and contrast refinements.


  • Preparing a CMS-ready component library, enabling SEMTE administrators to update content quickly without breaking the structure.


The long-term goal is to create a reliable, intuitive resource that students can trust throughout their academic journey and one that can evolve with SEMTE’s programs and policies.

Moving forward, the next steps would focus on refining and validating the design through:


  • Usability testing on the high-fidelity prototype to confirm improvements in navigation, clarity, and findability.


  • Content collaboration with SEMTE staff, ensuring program pages remain accurate, consistent, and easy to maintain.


  • Enhancing personalization, such as adding role-based quick access sections (e.g., international students, graduating students, new admits).


  • Iterating on accessibility, including improved alt text coverage, heading structure, and contrast refinements.


  • Preparing a CMS-ready component library, enabling SEMTE administrators to update content quickly without breaking the structure.


The long-term goal is to create a reliable, intuitive resource that students can trust throughout their academic journey and one that can evolve with SEMTE’s programs and policies.